deafeningdecibel.com deafeningdecibel.com
   Index Page :> About Us :> Privacy Policy :> Terms & Conditions :> Place Your Link :> Add Your Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 
   

Home Family & Garden

   

Software & Networking

   

Drink & Food

   

Business & Commerce

   

Children

   

Automobile & Automotive

   

Recreation & Entertainment

   

Law & Politics

   

Finance & Investment

   

Self Enhancement

   

Games & Play

   

Research & Science

   

Relationship & Lifestyle

   

Online Shopping

   

Travel & Accommodation

   

Employment & Careers

   

Art & Culture

   

Medical Care

   

People & Communities

   

Estate & Realty

   

Academics & Education

   

Sports

   

Health & Hygiene

   

News & Media

 

Index Page » Software & Networking » SEO Services
 

Vertical Creep in Search Results - Should Organic Optimizers be Concerned?

 

This year, like many people, I wasnt able to attend. However, I wanted to keep up with the news, so I found a great source of reports and updates. I will summarize the most important sessions to the best of my ability.

In my opinion, one of the most crucial topics is Vertical Creep.

Vertical creep is when non-organic and non-paid results start occupying top spots in search results. Verticals started showing up in search results back when Altavista was popular, and since then have grown into a much more sophisticated part of the overall search engine results page. Greg Jarboe was the first to speak of vertical creep and introduced everyone to verticals.

All the engines have verticals in some form or another nowadays. Google has its famous OneBox which is generally the place immediately below the top sponsored ads but immediately above the organic results. This is where you will find news, Froogle, and image results which may match a query.

For example, I wrote a few weeks ago about how, when you searched for Olympics on Google, you were presented with video results at the top of the page. But it doesnt stop there. Do a search for New Orleans, for example, and in Google you are presented with not only news results but also map results, pushing the organic results down so that only the top 2 or 3 results are showing. Much less than the typical 4 or 5 we are used to seeing.

One of the biggest impacts of Verticals is the stretching of the search results page. It is becoming ever clearer that everything but the top 1 or 2 organic is worth less because it could be pushed below the fold, whereas sponsoreds value is increasing because there are less organic results visible.

According to Gord Hotchkiss, however, the impact on verticals, at least on Yahoo! And MSN, isnt as great. His firm has recently completed research on how users interact with search engines. The Yahoo! MSN research performed by Hotchkiss firm is a follow up to Google research the firm completed last year at this time.

According to Hotchkiss, Google does a better job of incorporating Verticals into results. Google users are more accepting of them while Yahoo! and MSN users tend to scan more of the results on a page, thereby negating the impact verticals have on organic results.

This could mean a couple of things. First, as Hotchkiss suggests, Google may have trained its users. We are used to seeing the verticals (and hit bolding and inconsistently displayed sponsored results) and are therefore more accepting to the varying page changes, while Yahoo! and MSN users are less forgiving, perhaps because they feel the results displayed are less relevant. This isnt too hard to believe considering he gave an example of searching for New York Pizza on MSN and NOT getting pizza places but getting news about pizza in New York.

Personally, I too have experienced this, especially with MSN. It seems to have more of a problem determining what types of verticals are relevant to the searcher.

Bob Carilli was up next and presented a case study on how effective verticals have been for one of his clients.

Through some analysis they found that Froogle shopping results were showing up a lot for his clients competitive keyword terms, yet the Froogle listings were unoptimized.

They responded by creating a data feed for Froogle which was optimized to target these great phrases which had poor Froogle listings. As a result, his clients site quickly moved to the top of the Froogle listings for those phrases. While it is unclear, I would assume this would have translated into similar top rankings in the Google area where Froogle is displayed.

This also shows that, as search marketers, we shouldnt rely solely on SEO or PPC. There are dozens of verticals out there we could tap into if we had an open mind.

If you look at Google alone, there are opportunities in Google News (with properly optimized press releases), Froogle, as mentioned above, Google Local, Google Base, Google Video and more. Similarly, with Yahoo! and MSN there are verticals to research. Both engines also have a shopping portal, as well as news, video and local results.

In the end, verticals could become the poor mans SEO tactic. If you cant compete organically and cant pay for top sponsored, perhaps you can optimize your product feed to appear ahead of all your competitors?

Author: Sullivan Rob
 
Author Bio:
Sullivan Rob is a eminent columnist. Sullivan likes to write articles about this subject.
This article can be searched using: search engine optimization services, search engine optimization firm
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Score High With Your Wisconsin Site - Part 1
 
A Guide To Ultrasonic
 
RFID Tracking
 
Design With Purpose
 
Secrets of Successful Advertising
 
Photo Software for Digital Camera - How to Make a Choice?
 
Microsoft Has A Plan For The Xbox 360
 
Cisco CCNA Exam Tutorial: The Best Time To Schedule Your Exam
 
Testing a Transformer- How To Accurately Test A Transformer
 
Are Popups Good for Marketing? Annoying to Some, Interesting to Others!
 
 
 
Index Page :> Privacy Policy :> Terms & Conditions  
© 2006-2008 www.deafeningdecibel.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.